Will Power Article

No Snacks, no sweets, no seconds. Except on Days that start with S. Too simple for you? Simple is why it works. Look here for questions, introductions, support, success stories.

Moderators: Soprano, automatedeating

Post Reply
Jen1974
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:49 pm
Location: Colorado

Will Power Article

Post by Jen1974 »

Anothe article that reminds me of why No S is best (:

http://blog.myfitnesspal.com/need-just- ... bb=disable
LifeisaBlessing
Posts: 339
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 1:08 pm

Post by LifeisaBlessing »

Fantastic article, Jen--thanks for posting! :)
I can't change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination.
~Jimmy Dean

The second you overcomplicate it is the second it becomes the thing for which it is a corrective.
~El Fug, on the NoS Diet
User avatar
kaalii
Posts: 745
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 9:42 pm
Location: switzerland

Post by kaalii »

excellent!
Age:40
BMI: 18.8
Body Fat %: 17.6
in it for maintenance and, more importantly, sanity!!
Bluebell
Posts: 633
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 7:17 pm
Location: Hampshire UK

Post by Bluebell »

Excellent article, thank you for posting. I think after years of yoyo dieting, I had come to realise that all of those things are true. I just didn't know how to put it into practice. Thank goodness I have discovered No S to give me the framework :D
MaggieMae
Posts: 600
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2015 9:53 pm
Location: Ohio, USA

Post by MaggieMae »

Great article!
User avatar
Merry
Posts: 1658
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:14 am

Post by Merry »

Good article, and the one linked from within it about the "hunger scale" was interesting too. http://blog.myfitnesspal.com/the-simple ... vereating/

I might try to keep that in mind for S days and vacations.
Homeschool Mom and No S returnee as of 11-30-15.
2 years and counting on No-S.
29 lbs. down, 34 to go. Slow and steady wins the race.
Respect Moderation
Bluebell
Posts: 633
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 7:17 pm
Location: Hampshire UK

Post by Bluebell »

That article is very interesting Merry. Reading it, I am not sure I have ever experienced Really Hungry, Nearing Empty or Empty. I may have thought I have but reading the descriptions, Hungry is probably the most I have ever been!
Definitely makes 3 meals a day seem manageable!
User avatar
Merry
Posts: 1658
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 2:14 am

Post by Merry »

Bluebell wrote:That article is very interesting Merry. Reading it, I am not sure I have ever experienced Really Hungry, Nearing Empty or Empty. I may have thought I have but reading the descriptions, Hungry is probably the most I have ever been!
Definitely makes 3 meals a day seem manageable!
I need to read it again, but tonight when my dd made cinnamon rolls, I debated whether the World Series made it an S-worthy event (or even a red-day worthy event!), and then I thought--I'm comfortably full right now and while I might enjoy a taste, that would definitely put me in the overly full, why did I do that category. I didn't even miss not having one once I thought of it that way!
Homeschool Mom and No S returnee as of 11-30-15.
2 years and counting on No-S.
29 lbs. down, 34 to go. Slow and steady wins the race.
Respect Moderation
oolala53
Posts: 10106
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:46 am
Location: San Diego, CA USA

Post by oolala53 »

For those who would benefit, I respectfully suggest that the goal of weight loss (know the reasons why you want to lose weight) the author mentions be amended to the goal of moderation, which can be met before, during, after and without weight loss.

Having values for eating and habits really take the most advantage of willpower's benefit and limitations.
Count plates, not calories. 11 years "during"
Age 71
BMI Jan/10-30.8
1/12-26.8 3/13-24.9 +/- 8-lb. 3 yrs
9/17 22.8 (flux) 3/18 22.2
2 yrs flux 6/20 22
12/20/24 24.1

There is no S better than (mod) Vanilla No S
Post Reply